justice:equivalence
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| justice:equivalence [2026/10/30 19:19] – created admin | justice:equivalence [2026/10/31 14:40] (current) – admin | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| **Equivalence** | **Equivalence** | ||
| - | **Equivalence: | + | The natrual |
| - | autonomy). Sovereignty and Slavery are universally illegitimate theories | + | autonomy).\\ |
| + | |||
| + | Sovereignty and Slavery are universally illegitimate theories | ||
| of action in an optimal system. In mutualist relationships, | of action in an optimal system. In mutualist relationships, | ||
| - | with greater Authority/ | + | with greater Authority/ |
| - | Stewardship for those with less (significantly). | + | Stewardship for those with less (significantly), to the extent that they are capable of withou causing net harm to the system. |
| + | |||
| + | {{justice: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | One application of this principle is to determine Stewardship and resolution of inequality. This model shows 2 Agents (Entities) that have unequal autonomy, and their position on the line of Equivalence. The Agent with the higher position on the line incurs the Duty of Stewardship.\\ | ||
| - | {{humansystems: | + | {{humansystems: |
justice/equivalence.1793387942.txt.gz · Last modified: by admin
