Scientific Justice Wiki

(Principles and Practices)

User Tools

Site Tools


humansystems:qualityoflife

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
humansystems:qualityoflife [2026/10/08 13:23] – created adminhumansystems:qualityoflife [2026/10/22 21:02] (current) – admin
Line 1: Line 1:
-Quality of Life (QOL)+**Quality of Life (QOL)**
  
 The universal metric for determining the state (perfomance) of a human system is The universal metric for determining the state (perfomance) of a human system is
Line 6: Line 6:
 possible (sub-optimal only). possible (sub-optimal only).
  
-A Human System Optimum is defined by 4 interdependent conditions.+A **Human System Optimum** is defined by 4 interdependent conditions.
  
-First: no one (in the system) can be made better off without+**First:** no one (in the system) can be made better off without
 making someone else worse off.\\  making someone else worse off.\\ 
-Second: everyone (in the system) can’t be made better off in total+**Second:** everyone (in the system) can’t be made better off in total
 (systemic aggregate).\\  (systemic aggregate).\\ 
-Third: no one can be moved closer to the optimum (median) without+**Third:** no one can be moved closer to the optimum (median) without
 moving someone else further away.\\  moving someone else further away.\\ 
-Fourth: the entire system is sustainable.\\ +**Fourth:** the entire system is sustainable.\\ 
  
-An optimal system is the ideal way to provide the greatest good for the+An optimized system is the ideal way to sustainably provide the greatest good for the
 most people for the longest time. Sub-optimal systems all fail to most people for the longest time. Sub-optimal systems all fail to
 simultaneously achieve the optimum defined by these four conditions. simultaneously achieve the optimum defined by these four conditions.
Line 32: Line 32:
 for managing it determines the quality of the consequences produced. for managing it determines the quality of the consequences produced.
 Leaders (formal and informal) require a full understanding of human Leaders (formal and informal) require a full understanding of human
-systems, if they intend to realize optimum performance (systemic) within a system. This is difficult because humans are easily seduced and intoxicated by +systems, if they intend to realize optimum performance (systemic). This is difficult because humans are easily seduced and intoxicated by Power (Social), and generally become addicted to it. Control of  
-the control of Power (Social), and generally become addicted to it. More +Power over a long period produces greater addiction. Social Power elites who possess control over such
-Power over a longer period produces a greater addiction. Elites who possess control over such+
 Power become encased in a bubble surrounded by peers, sycophants, and Power become encased in a bubble surrounded by peers, sycophants, and
-parasites, rarely utilizing a competent "Devil’s Advocate" for feedback. +parasites. They forget the need for a competent "Devil’s Advocate" to ensure diversity of feedback. 
-This “Power Addiction Syndrome” is the natural enemy of optimization, +This “Power Addiction Syndrome” is the enemy of optimization, creating the most difficult barrier to any form of real systemic improvement.
-creating the most difficult barrier to any form of real systemic +
-improvement.+
  
 A governance system is a special type of human system because it is A governance system is a special type of human system because it is
Line 77: Line 74:
 Universal Metrics for Quality of Life Universal Metrics for Quality of Life
  
-1. Balance (optimum, norm, median, middle way)\\  +1. **Balance** (optimum, norm, median, middle way)\\  
-2. Love (belonging, sense of oneness, trust, etc.)\\  +2. **Love** (belonging, sense of oneness, trust, etc.)\\  
-3. Health (physical, mental, spiritual)\\  +3. **Health** (physical, mental, spiritual)\\  
-4. Truth (the most useful interpretation of reality)\\  +4. **Truth** (the most useful interpretation of reality)\\  
-5. Play (fun, enjoyment)\\  +5. **Play** (fun, enjoyment)\\  
-6. Fortune (good/bad luck, chance)\\  +6. **Fortune** (good/bad luck, chance, randomness)\\  
-7. Autonomy (self-directed power/control/freedom)\\  +7. **Autonomy** (self-directed power/control/freedom)\\  
-8. Security (protection, privacy, peace, safety)\\  +8. **Security** (protection, privacy, peace, safety)\\  
-9. Work (productive labor)\\  +9. **Work** (productive labor)\\  
-10. Justice (systemic optimization, fairness)\\ +10. **Justice** (systemic optimization, fairness)\\  
 + 
 +Balance is a special case that acts as a meta-element for the other 9 dimensions.
  
 The positive and negative ends of the spectrum for each one of these The positive and negative ends of the spectrum for each one of these
-elements are well known and can be applied to form the practical metrics necessary for +dimensions are well known and can be mathematically formulated to provide the practical metrics necessary for optimization projects. 
-optimization.+
  
humansystems/qualityoflife.1791465812.txt.gz · Last modified: by admin