Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- humansystems:agentarchetypes [2026/10/07 16:14] – created admin
+++ humansystems:agentarchetypes [2026/10/13 16:46] (current) – admin
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+**Universal Agent Archetypes (UAA)**
 All human systems involve Autonomous Agents (Players, Actors, Entities), both real (people) and fictitious (organizations).
+Reflection, is the natural human ability to think and feel about how one
+thinks and feels. Self-deception and self-awareness are the inversely
+related internal manifestations of Reflection. Externally, one can
+therefore also think and feel about how others think and feel (empathy,
+projection, etc.). This ability becomes fully developed at around 12
+years of age (normal). All human adults (Agents) can therefore be
+classified by this intrinsically “bilateral” mechanism into 4 distinct
+strategy Archetypes.
+{{ :humansystems:uaatable.png?direct |}}
+The utility function (goal) in this taxonomy can be defined by narrative
+and by formal Mechanism Design Theory (MDT). Mutualist Utility Function
+(narrative form): Optimum of total aggregate utility with a
+simultaneously optimum of equality (parity) of individual utility.
+Mutualist Utility Function (MDT 2 x 2 ordinal form): u=((x<sub>i</sub> +
+y<sub>i</sub>) + \|x<sub>i </sub>– y<sub>i</sub>\|)/2 : where x<sub>i
+</sub>= Agent R utility ordinal (Narcissistic) and y<sub>i</sub> = Agent
+C utility ordinal (Narcissistic).
+A complete analysis reveals that only a 100% homogeneous population of
+Mutualists can consistently produce and sustain optimal social systems
+as the natural outcome. All other populations can only produce unstable,
+sub-optimal systems. Since fictitious Agents (States, corporations,
+etc.) are analogs (legal fictions) of actual humans, their strategic
+Agency is also fully defined by this same taxonomy.
+Ideally, an optimal political system achieves the 4 goals intended for Quality of
+Life. All Agents that aren’t true Mutualists would be required to consent to acting “as
+if” they are Mutualists, in order to ensure efficient optimization. Ideally, human
+systems allow only true Mutualists in control (Leadership) roles within
+the 3 domains of Social Power, because their behavior would then naturally serve Justice over Power.
+There are subconscious motivations as well as conscious motivations for human agents. It’s possible for any Archetype to eventually become a true Mutualists through the practice of
+self-discipline. The 4 Archetypes, The Shadow, the 3 Impulses, and
+Reflection constitute the internal framework (first order) that
+determines systemic outcomes [What is internal is externalized, and
+what is external is internalized].