Scientific Justice Wiki

(Principles and Practices)

User Tools

Site Tools


examples:crimes

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
examples:crimes [2026/10/10 18:29] – adminexamples:crimes [2026/10/10 18:39] (current) – admin
Line 100: Line 100:
  
 Ideally, those who fill such roles must be assessed according to their systemic/issue relationship in order to identify which individuals (entities) have the highest qualifications to arbitrate. As can be seen in the following Arbitrator Legitimacy Spectrum, under no circumstances can a Participant in an Issue ever establish a legitimate standing to arbitrate that issue. In such cases, they should recuse themselves or else be barred from hearing the issue. Ideally, those who fill such roles must be assessed according to their systemic/issue relationship in order to identify which individuals (entities) have the highest qualifications to arbitrate. As can be seen in the following Arbitrator Legitimacy Spectrum, under no circumstances can a Participant in an Issue ever establish a legitimate standing to arbitrate that issue. In such cases, they should recuse themselves or else be barred from hearing the issue.
 +
 +{{ :examples:adjudication.png?direct |}}\\ 
  
 The “he who is without sin” principle provides simple guidance for selecting those who participate in prosecution of a Universal Crime. Any party that commits the same or similar offenses are unqualified to participate in the prosecution, whether they have previously been convicted or not. The “he who is without sin” principle provides simple guidance for selecting those who participate in prosecution of a Universal Crime. Any party that commits the same or similar offenses are unqualified to participate in the prosecution, whether they have previously been convicted or not.
- 
- 
  
 One of the greatest challenges for Justice occurs under conditions of systemic criminality (corruption) in which the most powerful players (and their Accessories) are also perpetrators. In such cases, it can be difficult to recruit an individual or group who is ready, willing, and able (sufficient Social Power) to uphold Justice in the case of powerful perpetrators. One of the greatest challenges for Justice occurs under conditions of systemic criminality (corruption) in which the most powerful players (and their Accessories) are also perpetrators. In such cases, it can be difficult to recruit an individual or group who is ready, willing, and able (sufficient Social Power) to uphold Justice in the case of powerful perpetrators.
  
examples/crimes.1791656994.txt.gz · Last modified: by admin